• Subscribe

Bruniquel news and updates

News from the world of Bruniquel

It’s Strike Season again!

Bruniquel Bulletin #4-2014

A time for cool heads

Our national news has again been dominated firstly by the Platinum strike and now the Numsa strike in the Metal industry. What is really of concern is the violence that has accompanied the strikes and the lack of concern for the rights of others.

Impact of the Platinum Strike

Fed by the apparent success of the Platinum strike, Numsa members are demanding a 12% (15%?) increase and the banning of labour brokers. Significantly, Numsa strikers are quoted in the local newspapers as saying that Amcu has shown the way by holding firm and forcing management to accede to their demands.

Whether that is true of course is another matter. There is often a difference between the settlement appearing in the media and the reality on the floor. More importantly what is the long term impact of the strike in the Platinum mining industry going to be? How many jobs are going to be lost? This remains to be seen.

Businesses have to make a profit and they have to have a stable environment in which to do so. If that can’t be achieved, investment is withdrawn and people lose their jobs. Killing the goose that lays the golden egg has never proved to be a good strategy!

What is of concern is the militancy that the Platinum strike has triggered and which this country can ill afford.

The Government needs to play its part by:

  • changing the law governing strikes;
  • holding unions accountable for encouraging or allowing their members to partake in violence  and destruction of property; and
  • ensuring that police are trained and equipped to deal with the violence during strikes.From employers one often hears “Let them go on strike! I will close the business before I give in to them!” That is easily said but not as easily done. It is not easy to close a business and to walk away from everything you have worked for!

When the reality sets in, these same employers are often inclined to capitulate and in so doing, set themselves up for further strikes as well as anarchy on the shopfloor. The on-going strikes and the violence which has accompanied them over recent years and the lack of discipline in the public sector show that lessons have not been learned.

Causes of strikes

Strikes occur when there is a breakdown in relationships between the leadership of an organisation and the people whom they expect to carry out the work. The causes of a strike are seldom just the issues on the table (e.g. more money or labour brokers).

The unstated causes can range from poor communication to deep seated grievances about the way people are treated by management, or by the powers-that-be, in the case of political strikes or protests.

There is an old saying, “You can please some of the people some of the time but you can’t please all the people all the time”. While some people are naturally positive and optimistic, others go through life continually criticising and complaining. For some complaining is a way of getting attention.

There will always be someone who is unhappy about something. If the majority of employees are happy in their work and do not have serious cause for complaint, these complainers are largely ignored. However, if employees have cause to doubt that their bosses really care about them and have their best interests at heart, they can be easily persuaded that they do not!

img (1)

Influencers

Behind every strike, there is a fairly small influential group. Sometimes they have vested interests, which can range from ego tripping to using industrial action as a means of drawing management’s attention away from theft taking place within the business. In one particular case in a bus company for example, taxi operators were behind a series of strikes. When the buses didn’t run they were able to charge premium rates!

It is important to remember that while a minority might seek conflict, the majority of people would prefer to avoid it, especially if they have something to lose. Therefore for people to be mobilised to strike, there has to be some underlying dissatisfaction which the strike organisers can utilise.

Control mentality

One of the conditions which make an employer more vulnerable to strikes is leadership who exhibit a ‘control’ mentality in their management style. Using the framework of McGregor’s Theory X Theory Y, one finds that a large number of South African managers and supervisors think in a Theory X paradigm:-

  • The average employee dislikes work and will avoid it if possible.
  • Because people dislike work, they must be told what to do, controlled, or threatened with punishment to get them to work.
  • The average employee avoids responsibility, has little ambition and wants job security above all.

With this type of thinking, it is assumed that employees cannot be given responsibility and systems are set up to monitor and control them so that they do not loaf or misbehave. This can be done via video cameras or through supervisors whose main function is to ‘keep an eye’ on employees to ensure that they work properly.

Commitment

The problem is that employees in these types of workplaces do not have a sense of pride in their work – how can they? They are not trusted! Therefore they feel little commitment to their jobs or to their employer, even if they are well paid.

More often than not, they are bored in their jobs and therefore easier to influence by anyone wishing to organise a strike (for whatever reason). After all, a strike can provide exitement and the prospect of improved benefits can be very enticing!

‘Troublemakers’

‘Trouble makers’ in organisations are often employees with natural leadership potential but sometimes due to lack of recognition, they become disillusioned and negative. Sometimes they become ‘troublemakers’ because they have complaints which are mishandled or ignored. They do not get positive recognition from their bosses so they get attention in other ways. As the Bible says ‘it is better to be scolded than ignored’.

Leadership

Employers in this country need to pay serious attention to leadership within the business at all levels if these sort of situations are to be avoided. Management who are ‘control freaks’ and weak supervisors usually lead to disgruntled employees – regardless of the conditions of employment.

The way to avoid strikes and all the unpleasantness that goes with them is to focus on ‘winning the hearts and minds’ of employees by introducing a management culture whereby people are valued. This can only be achieved by selecting and training leaders who can create an organisational climate wherein employees are given respect, dignity and real responsibility!

These sort of leaders will understand that prevention is better than cure. They will understand the importance of creating jobs with real responsibility, of giving recognition where it is due, of dealing with employee complaints expeditiously and ensuring that employees understand that wages and conditions of employment must conform to what the business can afford.

Bruno Bruniquel